Files
DynamisLab/docs/JFM_WYQ/ROUND2_TOP_DOWN/README.md
T
Frank14fandCursor 0ade812864 docs(jfm): establish traceable manuscript planning baseline
Track the research dossiers, section freezes, supporting manuscript materials, and round-aware agent controls so future drafting decisions can be reviewed across both repository mirrors.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-08-10 18:51:53 +08:00

37 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Round 2 — Top-Down JFM Design
## 目标
Round 2 基于 Round 1 的全部 dossiers 与 coverage audit,进行自上而下的 JFM manuscript 设计。目标是明确:
- manuscript title
- physics narrative
- section hierarchy
- approximate text / figure allocation
- main-text / supplement boundary
- evidence dependencies。
本轮不是写 manuscript prose,而是建立可审计的论文结构、物理叙事和证据依赖框架。
## 预定输出
1. `01_PHYSICS_NARRATIVE_AND_OUTLINES.md`
2. `02_JFM_STRUCTURE_AND_SPACE_BENCHMARK.md`
3. `03_EVIDENCE_STRESS_TEST.md`
4. `04_TOP_LEVEL_SYNTHESIS.md`
5. `05_REVISED_STRUCTURE_FREEZE.md` — author-ratified revision and Round-3 structure handoff
6. `06_SECTION_LEVEL_JFM_STYLE_GUIDE.md` — controlling chapter-level JFM style input for Round 3
## 工作约束
- `04_TOP_LEVEL_SYNTHESIS.md` 必须回读 Round 1 的全部 dossiers,以及关键 package authority;不得只依据摘要或二手汇总。
- 保留并明确区分 Legacy / V5。
- 保留 case-specific metrics,不将个案指标无依据地泛化为普适结论。
- 明确 claim boundaries:区分已被证据支持的主张、条件性主张、待验证主张与不应提出的主张。
- 每一项关键结构或叙事选择都应能追溯到相应的 evidence dependencies。
## Author-ratified freeze (2026-08-10)
Round 3 is jointly controlled by `05_REVISED_STRUCTURE_FREEZE.md` for manuscript structure and `06_SECTION_LEVEL_JFM_STYLE_GUIDE.md` for chapter-level JFM style, read together with the evidence dependencies in `04_TOP_LEVEL_SYNTHESIS.md`. It records the provisional frozen title, terminology and metric hierarchy, corrected steady → Kármán → vortex → illusion/erase → experiment progression, revised section/space allocation, and the section/module-based Round-3 handoff. Where it conflicts with recommendations in `01``04`, the older recommendation is retained as provenance but marked superseded; evidence status and repository authority are unchanged.