Files
CelerisLab/docs/validation/taylor_green.md
T
ClaudeandClaude Opus 5.5 ffff742b69 test: add oblique (2,1) shear-wave diagnostic with composite modal fit
Test-only. New shear_wave.py (exact field, equilibrium initializer reusing
frozen oracle constants/geometry, area-weighted composite metrics with a
2x2 Gram-matrix modal fit, late-time rate fit, preregistered assess with
max(2*control, floor) budgets). run_case.py gains --flow (default
taylor_green, unchanged receipt). oracle.py byte-identical (pinned by test).
CPU manufactured checks in test_shear_wave.py; docs record caveats.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-19 00:16:21 +00:00

246 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Periodic 2D Taylor–Green AMR campaign (prepared, not GPU-qualified)
This validation harness complements DFG Re100 and Jet/body tests. It measures
smooth 2D periodic decay and errors crossing fixed refinement interfaces at
Re_L=100 and 1000. It does **not** certify 3D turbulence, LES, Jet performance,
wall conditions, dynamic refinement or general high-Re flows.
## Reference and conventions
Primary implementation-author documentation, checked 2026-10-18:
- TensorMesh, exact velocity and pressure with a consistent phase:
https://docs.tensor-mesh.com/example_gallery/fluid/taylor_green.html
- AeroSim Nassu, 2D decay, energy and lattice-length Re definition:
https://docs.aerosim.io/nassu/validation/analytical/04_taylor_green_vortex_2d/README.html
We use the TensorMesh phase, rescaled to length L=N root cells:
k = 2*pi/L; A(t) = U*exp(-2*nu*k*k*t)
ux = -A*cos(k*x)*sin(k*y)
uy = A*sin(k*x)*cos(k*y)
p/rho0 = -A*A/4 * (cos(2*k*x)+cos(2*k*y))
E = <|u|^2>/2 = U*U/4 * exp(-4*nu*k*k*t)
Pressure is kinematic, with rho0=1. A global velocity sign reversal leaves
pressure unchanged; exchanging sine/cosine without the corresponding pressure
phase can reverse its sign. CPU tests independently check momentum residuals.
The nonlinear acceleration is a pressure gradient, **not zero**; the AeroSim
page's prose calling advection zero is not adopted. Do not mix phase variants
from different references. The formulas above are verified by substitution,
not by trusting a copied pressure expression.
Re_L=U*L/nu, not Re_k=U/(nu*k)=Re_L/(2*pi). U=.03 in lattice units,
Ma=U/cs=.0519615, cs^2=1/3, nu_root=.03*N/Re_L. Acoustic refinement uses
h_l=dt_l=2^-l: lattice velocity stays U, nu_l=2^l*nu_root and
tau_l=.5+3*nu_l. The worst root tau is .50288 (N32/Re1000), omega=1.98855,
inside the existing config guard. No viscosity clamping or guard override.
All initial arrays are physical FP64 equilibrium populations, supplied to the
public shifted-FP32 postcollision-G initializer. rho=1+3p at each true cell
center. These are valid equilibrium postcollision states, but do not include
Chapman–Enskog nonequilibrium stress; startup acoustic/kinetic error remains in
the measurements and is shared with uniform baselines. The incompressible
reference is not an exact finite-Mach LBM solution. This is why resolution alone
need not remove the full error floor.
## Geometry and workload
All patches use level-wide union form, so origins are zero, including fine
arrays with holes. Coordinates are (index+.5)*2^-level. Metrics integrate only
ACTIVE leaves, each weighted by 4^-level. Covered cells and halo cells never
enter norms or mass. Geometry tests prove exact single coverage at root-cell
resolution. All blocks are 8x8, and both root dimensions are periodic.
At each root N=32,64:
- 2 levels: L1 rectangle (N/8,N/8,7N/8,3N/4), in L0 indices.
- 3 levels: same L1 plus L2 rectangle (3N/4,N/2,3N/2,5N/4), in L1 indices.
These off-axis boundaries cross nonzero flow and gradients rather than sitting
only on symmetry or stagnation lines. Whole geometry scales with N.
16 cases: at each Re, uniform N=32,64,128,256 plus AMR (root32/root64)x(depth2/depth3).
Each AMR case therefore has both a same-root uniform baseline and a uniform
baseline at its finest spacing. Uniform N is its own lattice length, so nu and
step count are scaled to represent the same nondimensional solution.
Samples t*=tU/L = 0,.12,.24,.36,.48. End time is 16*N base steps, a meaningful
.48 domain turnover or 3.016 vortex-scale turnover times (scale 1/k).
At Re1000 energy decays about 7.3%; at Re100 about 53.1%. No plots or full fields;
each case writes five diagnostic rows and provenance, incrementally.
## Running (GPU owner must schedule launches)
CPU checks, from the repository root:
PYTHONPATH=src python -m unittest discover -s tests/validation/taylor_green -p 'test_*.py' -v
One GPU case, on the scheduled worker after checking occupancy:
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=<physical-id> python tests/validation/taylor_green/run_case.py --repo /path/to/reviewed/checkout --re 100 --n 32 --depth 1 --output output/taylor_green/re100_n32_d1.json
Depth 1 is uniform. Run uniform cases before AMR for each Re; inspect baseline
screening failures before proceeding. For a complete matrix, repeat the uniform
call with N=32,64,128,256 and AMR calls with N=32,64 / depth=2,3, at each Re.
Use serial process startup on the parent's assigned Horsea GPUs. This harness
does not schedule or acquire GPUs. No GPU was used during preparation.
python tests/validation/taylor_green/assess.py output/taylor_green/re*_n*_d*.json --output output/taylor_green/assessment.json
The local API/geometry review used clean staging commit
cd3a657f9d3833e812c3cca173525f165b48710a. This is **not** a claim of results on d79
or any historical commit. Each runtime output records actual Git HEAD/dirty
state, an aggregate source-tree hash, plus SHA256 of all harness Python files. Assessment refuses dirty checkouts and mixed source
or harness identities. Keep reports outside the checkout or .gitignore them so
new outputs do not change its dirty flag between cases. The source-tree hash excludes bytecode caches; production qualification requires
a clean checkout.
The runner uses the existing PeriodicBlockStepper / FixedPatchStepper periodic
paths only. It does not depend on the new channel-root implementation.
## Preregistered assessment, before any GPU results
All sampled times must satisfy finite screening ceilings:
- Relative composite velocity L2 <= 5%
- Relative globally gauge-adjusted pressure L2 <= 15%
- Relative kinetic-energy error <= 5%
- Composite mass drift from downloaded t0 <= 1e-5
These are screening budgets, not literature-certified tolerances. Acceptance
also requires all 16 cases, common source/harness, correct nondimensional times
and viscosity, and baseline-relative checks on worst post-startup-sample errors:
- AMR error <= max(2 * same-root uniform error, declared numerical floor).
- Root64 AMR error <= max(.9 * root32 AMR error, floor), for each depth/Re.
- Uniform256 error <= max(.9 * uniform32 error, floor).
Floors: velocity .002, pressure .02, energy .004. They are declared low-Mach /
equilibrium-startup budgets, not fitted to observed results. Ma^2=.0027 motivates
their scale; it is an asymptotic expectation, not a proof of those coefficients.
The coarse baseline sets the AMR budget because much of the domain remains
coarse. The finest uniform error and AMR/fine ratio are always reported, with no
claim that partial refinement should match a fully fine domain. A pass below a
floor is bounded accuracy, not a measured convergence order. Report errors and
ratios even for a pass. Failure requires diagnosis or a separately preregistered
follow-up, never retroactive tolerance tuning. Higher Re is deliberately absent;
Re100/1000 must first be stable, resolved and reviewed.
Diagnostics use one global pressure gauge, direct cell-center analytic values,
kinetic energy per unit reference mass, and actual leaf cell areas. Composite
midpoint quadrature introduces a small initial energy integration error, retained
rather than subtracted. Mass drift is relative to downloaded t0, so density
initialization and mixed-grid quadrature do not masquerade as time drift.
## Pilot scheduling and transfer-consistency scope
Start with one uniform case and one matched AMR case; the 16-case matrix is a
qualification plan, not authorization to launch every case automatically. The
GPU owner reviews the pilot before expanding it. Each process prints a flushed
READY only after initialization, a real base step exercising every level's
kernel/halo/transfer path, and a finite positive-density download check. That
step belongs to the measured trajectory; it is not discarded warmup. PROGRESS
messages contain each of the five diagnostic samples. READY alone is not an
accuracy pass. Reports include per-level active cells, hops and collision updates.
The complete matrix costs 768,540,672 active collision updates and 21,504 root
intervals, excluding ghost streaming, halos, transfers and diagnostic work.
Uniform N256 is the largest case (268,435,456 updates / 4096 intervals per Re).
AMR N64/depth3 needs 50,987,008 updates / 1024 intervals. These are work counts,
not GPU wall-time estimates. Baseline comparisons remain available on failed
screens and partial pilots; absent/nonfinite operands are null, never passing.
Acoustic viscosity scaling and unchanged lattice velocity do not by themselves
prove nonequilibrium-stress consistency across refinement interfaces. A smooth
collocated Chapman–Enskog postcollision nonequilibrium has a (tau-1)*h factor;
the existing implementation instead uses volumetric piecewise-constant explosion
and stream-only ghosts. Whether that actual transfer construction achieves the
needed stress accuracy is an unresolved question for this pilot to measure.
It is not a proven defect, and a collocated-state scaling factor must not be
inserted into this different transfer operator without a separate derivation
and validation. This campaign measures the current operator and makes no
theoretical stress-consistency certification or production-kernel change.
## Repository integration
The four Python harness files remain together under tests/validation/taylor_green, so runtime provenance hashes precisely this harness directory. Formatting changes produce a new harness identity; preparation and integrated receipts must not be mixed. All analytic definitions, numerical floors, assessment gates, sample times, and source-import assertions are unchanged. Production source is unchanged from the cd3 snapshot; these periodic tests do not waive the separate channel GPU gate.
## Oblique shear wave (test-only diagnostic, not GPU-qualified)
`shear_wave.py` reuses the frozen oracle's constants, cell centers and
geometry. `oracle.py` is byte-identical, and `test_shear_wave.py` pins its
eec4677 SHA-256. `run_case.py --flow shear_wave` selects it. The default flow
is still the frozen Taylor–Green oracle, and the default receipt is unchanged.
Convention: integer mode (2,1) on the L=N periodic root domain, so
`k = (2*pi/L)*(2,1)` points 26.565° from +x. Mode (1,2) would point 63.435°.
A wrong-mode test catches a swap between the two. Polarization is
`E = (-1,2)/sqrt(5)`, perpendicular to k:
u = U*E*sin(k.x + phi)*exp(-nu*|k|^2*t), phi = 0, p = const, rho0 = 1
Here `nu = U*N/100`, the Taylor–Green Re100 viscosity at the same N. The
initial condition is FP64 second-order equilibrium at the actual leaf
centers, with no non-equilibrium part.
Physical caveats:
1. *Finite-Mach error.* The second-order D2Q9 equilibrium has third moment
`sum_i f_eq c_a c_b c_g = rho*cs^2*(u_a d_bg + u_b d_ag + u_g d_ab)`. The
`(c.u)^2` term contributes only even moments. The continuum target also
has `rho*u_a*u_b*u_g`. At Navier–Stokes (first Chapman–Enskog) order,
the resulting stress error is proportional to `d_g(rho u_a u_b u_g)`.
For this field with uniform density, `u.grad = 0` and `div u = 0`, so
that particular term vanishes.
This does *not* show that all finite-Mach or cubic error vanishes. It
does not cover:
- higher Chapman–Enskog orders;
- lattice truncation for the oblique wavevector;
- FP32 storage;
- any density nonuniformity, which interfaces or anisotropy can create.
2. *Startup.* Equilibrium initialization omits the non-equilibrium stress.
The resulting kinetic transient lasts O(tau) steps and may shift the
in-phase amplitude. The decay rate is fitted from `ln(a_hat)` using
only samples with t* >= 0.12, which is about 1.9N root steps and much
longer than tau. This is intended to reduce startup sensitivity. It
has not been shown to cancel the bias, and that remains unverified
until measured.
Metrics are computed on ACTIVE leaf cells only, each weighted by its area
`4**-level` in root-cell units. The partition must cover the domain exactly
once. One global pressure gauge is used, never one per level.
- `a_hat`, `b_hat`: weighted least-squares fit of `u.E` onto the sin and cos
modes, solved with the 2x2 Gram matrix of the actual composite quadrature.
- `phase_drift = atan2(b_hat, a_hat)`, in radians.
- `rate_error = |rate_fit/(nu|k|^2) - 1|`, dimensionless. Rates are per root
step.
- `velocity_l2`: error relative to the exact field.
- `residual_l2`: the velocity left after subtracting the fitted mode,
relative to the exact-field norm.
- `longitudinal_l2`: the `u.k_hat` part of the velocity, relative to the
exact-field norm.
- `pressure_rel = p_rms/(A(t)^2/4)`: the gauged composite rms of
`p = (rho-1)/3`, divided by a *fixed analytic scale*.
- A²/4 is the continuum rms of the Taylor–Green exact pressure at the
same amplitude. That makes the number comparable in magnitude with TG
`pressure_l2`, but it is not that norm. TG normalizes by the discrete,
globally gauged exact-pressure norm on the composite grid.
- Exact pressure here is constant, so no relative-to-exact claim is made.
- Max and per-level values are reported for localization.
Preregistered screens (`shear_wave.assess`):
- Run set: uniform N, uniform 2N, and refined depth-2 runs at root N, with
constant and/or projected_linear explosion.
- `eps(N) = (|k| h_root)^2 = 5*(2*pi/N)^2`, dimensionless, coefficient one.
It is 0.01205 at N=128.
- Absolute screens: rate_error, max |phase_drift| (radians) and max
residual_l2 must each be <= eps. This is a preregistered diagnostic
choice of the second-order truncation scale, *not* a proven error bound.
- Existing ceilings also apply: velocity_l2 <= 0.05, mass <= 1e-5 and
pressure_rel <= 0.02.
- Budget form, as in `assess.py`:
`refined <= max(2*control_N, floor)`, with floors 0.002 for rate and
residual and 0.02 for pressure.
- The ratio to the 2N control is reported, not gated.
- A control failing an absolute screen makes the set INVALID_CONTROL. The
screens are never retuned.
Scope: one flow, one rectangle, SRT only. Two resolutions show a trend,
not an order. This does not establish placement robustness.