docs(jfm): establish traceable manuscript planning baseline
Track the research dossiers, section freezes, supporting manuscript materials, and round-aware agent controls so future drafting decisions can be reviewed across both repository mirrors. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# Round 2 — Top-Down JFM Design
|
||||
|
||||
## 目标
|
||||
|
||||
Round 2 基于 Round 1 的全部 dossiers 与 coverage audit,进行自上而下的 JFM manuscript 设计。目标是明确:
|
||||
|
||||
- manuscript title;
|
||||
- physics narrative;
|
||||
- section hierarchy;
|
||||
- approximate text / figure allocation;
|
||||
- main-text / supplement boundary;
|
||||
- evidence dependencies。
|
||||
|
||||
本轮不是写 manuscript prose,而是建立可审计的论文结构、物理叙事和证据依赖框架。
|
||||
|
||||
## 预定输出
|
||||
|
||||
1. `01_PHYSICS_NARRATIVE_AND_OUTLINES.md`
|
||||
2. `02_JFM_STRUCTURE_AND_SPACE_BENCHMARK.md`
|
||||
3. `03_EVIDENCE_STRESS_TEST.md`
|
||||
4. `04_TOP_LEVEL_SYNTHESIS.md`
|
||||
5. `05_REVISED_STRUCTURE_FREEZE.md` — author-ratified revision and Round-3 structure handoff
|
||||
6. `06_SECTION_LEVEL_JFM_STYLE_GUIDE.md` — controlling chapter-level JFM style input for Round 3
|
||||
|
||||
## 工作约束
|
||||
|
||||
- `04_TOP_LEVEL_SYNTHESIS.md` 必须回读 Round 1 的全部 dossiers,以及关键 package authority;不得只依据摘要或二手汇总。
|
||||
- 保留并明确区分 Legacy / V5。
|
||||
- 保留 case-specific metrics,不将个案指标无依据地泛化为普适结论。
|
||||
- 明确 claim boundaries:区分已被证据支持的主张、条件性主张、待验证主张与不应提出的主张。
|
||||
- 每一项关键结构或叙事选择都应能追溯到相应的 evidence dependencies。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Author-ratified freeze (2026-08-10)
|
||||
|
||||
Round 3 is jointly controlled by `05_REVISED_STRUCTURE_FREEZE.md` for manuscript structure and `06_SECTION_LEVEL_JFM_STYLE_GUIDE.md` for chapter-level JFM style, read together with the evidence dependencies in `04_TOP_LEVEL_SYNTHESIS.md`. It records the provisional frozen title, terminology and metric hierarchy, corrected steady → Kármán → vortex → illusion/erase → experiment progression, revised section/space allocation, and the section/module-based Round-3 handoff. Where it conflicts with recommendations in `01`–`04`, the older recommendation is retained as provenance but marked superseded; evidence status and repository authority are unchanged.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user