20 KiB
Moving circles on the uniform dense grid — S0 DRAFT contract
Status: DRAFT for review, not frozen. No implementation exists. Base: main
b2034f87e03656c5f67ab88562a70d6c338b9918. Scope approved by Frank (via TRON,
thread C0C78UFKGRM/1793335557.460509): uniform-grid prescribed translation and
single-cylinder free transverse VIV. Out of scope: refinement/blocked path,
pinball assembly, EsoPull, shifted storage, D3Q19, DynamisLab, manuscript.
Items marked OPEN are undecided; items marked CANDIDATE are proposals.
1. Working standards
- Lean, readable kernels in the existing idiom (
kernels/step/*.cu, sharedapply_bouzidi_link); Python manages state and validation. No framework, no compatibility layer, no new dependency. - The existing stationary/rotating path (
CurvedBoundaryKernel, host link packing,sync_bodies) stays byte-identical. Moving circles are a separate, explicitly enabled path with its own numerical contract (this file). - One authority per state (section 4). No per-step full-domain download, rebuild or recompile; local swept-band device updates are in scope.
- Small slices (S1 host spec, S2 kernels without motion, S3 motion + refill, S4 oscillator); each reviewed SHA is frozen before targeted runs.
- Tolerances, benchmark parameters and the force composition used in the structural RHS are declared before the runs that judge them. Fresh vs carried evidence and existing baseline failures are recorded; smoke, convergence and physical validation are reported separately. No undeclared force filtering.
- External code (waLBerla GPLv3, FluidX3D source-available, VIVSIM) is a concept reference only; nothing is copied.
2. Current update order (main b2034f87, dense double buffer)
Simulation.run(n): upload host action (if upload_act) → zero obs (if
zero_obs) → DoubleBufferStepper.step(n) → download obs → synchronize.
Per step (lbm/stepper.py step):
CurvedBoundaryKernelover the packed cut links: reads post-collisionG^{n-1}atk_f(andk_f - cfor q < 1/2), adds the moving-wall term (Uw = -omega*ry, Vw = omega*rx+ optional per-linksurface_velocity), writes the reflected value into slotoppof the solid nodek_s, and accumulatesc(f_toward + f_reflected)and torque intoobs.OneSteppull/collideddf → temp(collides FLUID cells; obstacle interiors flaggedSOLID|OBSTACLE|BC_CURVED), then buffer swap.ForceRegionKernel,SensorKernel.
Raw obs force is the force on the body (link derivation in section 6;
DFG docs report Cd > 0 from it). Translation vx, vy in the action slots is
currently stored but not read by any curved kernel.
3. Proposed update order (moving circles)
Per step n, before the existing step 1:
- M1
MovingCircleCells(one thread per swept-band cell): classify with the analytic predicatesin_old = inside(x, c^{n-1}),in_new = inside(x, c^n); writeflag = in_new ? SOLID|OBSTACLE|BC_CURVED : FLUID; covered cells (!in_old && in_new) accumulatenode_cover; fresh cells (in_old && !in_new) are refilled (section 5) and accumulatenode_uncover. - M2
MovingCircleLinks(one thread per band cell × direction): compute q and hit point atc^n(FP64, same formula asfind_circle_intersection, same clamp [0.01, 1] and fallback classes asCircleGeometry.build_cut_links), skip non-cut slots, callapply_bouzidi_linkwithu_w = (vx^n, vy^n) + omega × (hit - c^n), accumulate the link terms (section 6).
Then the unchanged steps 1–3. M2 must follow M1 because a q < 1/2 link may
read k_f - c at a fresh cell.
Exclusivity: moving bodies are never packed into the CurvedBoundaryKernel
link arrays (n_curved covers stationary/rotating bodies only), so M2 is the
sole writer of their solid slots and the sole source of their link force; no
double write and no double obs. The stationary path's packing, launch and
arithmetic are unchanged.
Completeness: after M1, every (fluid cell, direction) pair in the swept band
whose neighbour is in_new is visited by M2. This holds because the band is
the circle AABB at the declared extreme offsets plus 2 cells, and the host
rejects per-step moves of 1 cell or more and bands touching the domain edge,
other bodies, sensors or force regions. Each M2 write lands at
index_f(k_s, opp), the exact slot the adjacent fluid cell pulls, so every
fluid pull from a solid slot of a moving body is BFL-written.
4. State, masks and authority
- Host
ObjectStateis the single authority for one displacementoffset = (dx, dy)relative to the immutable base centre, plusvelocity = (vx, vy)andomega. Centres are always derived (c = base + offset), never stored as independent state. Velocity is supplied, never differenced from offsets. c^{n-1}is derived from the last committed offset,c^nfrom the offset being applied. Per body a small device motion record{c^{n-1}, c^n, u^n}is uploaded with the action buffer; action-slot meaning is not overloaded. (CANDIDATE layout; OPEN.)- Fail-closed commit: an enqueued upload is not a completed one. The new
offset becomes the committed offset only after the stream synchronization
that follows the upload and the step group succeeds. Any upload or later
synchronization failure leaves host and device motion state unknown: the
simulation is marked unusable (existing
_require_usablelifecycle), and no API may report a host/device match afterwards.
4a. Applied geometry vs pending target (CANDIDATE, narrow API)
Two distinct facts per moving body, one authority each:
applied = offset of the geometry last applied on the device, changed only
by a successful commit; pending = an optional requested target
(offset, velocity), changed only by set_body. A setter returning proves
nothing about the device. The uploaded motion record is derived each run:
{c_old = base + applied, c_new = base + (pending.offset or applied), u = pending.velocity or 0}. Translational wall velocity exists only on a step
that advances to a pending target; a hold step (c_old == c_new) has
translational u_w = 0 (spin unchanged), so a non-advancing circle never
acts as a sliding wall. One moving step consumes one target.
| situation | contract |
|---|---|
set_body target |
validated against applied (box, ` |
| two setters before a run | last wins; each validated against applied, not against the earlier pending target |
run(1) with pending |
upload record, step, sync; on success applied := pending, pending := None |
run(1) without pending |
hold: c_old == c_new, no cover/uncover, links at applied, translational u_w = 0 |
run(n > 1) with pending |
ValueError before mutation (single-step-only moving API) |
run(n > 1), no pending |
allowed: hold for n steps, translational u_w = 0, spin only |
run(0) |
no motion upload, no commit; pending kept |
| validation failure | ValueError, nothing mutated, retry allowed |
| upload/launch/sync failure after enqueue | simulation unusable; applied and pending are not reported as device truth; no re-entry |
Displacement norm: Euclidean per-step |c_new - c_old|_2 ≤ 0.5 lattice
cells (declared bound; CANDIDATE value).
- Membership is never read from a flag that M1 is overwriting. The host
verifies at
add_bodythat every swept-band cell has base flag FLUID, so the band's base state is known without readingflag_gpu. flag_gpuis the device authority for band cells while a moving body exists; the host flag mirror is stale for those cells and is not used.
5. Refill of fresh cells (CANDIDATE)
- Stored time level: everything in
ddfat M1 is post-collisionG^{n-1}; the refill writes all 9 slots at that same level, so every slot of a fresh cell that the following pull or a q < 1/2 link may read is defined. Donor values are read at the same levelG^{n-1}(old-fluid cells, untouched by M1). G = f_eq(rho_bar, u_w(x)) + G_neq(x_d)whererho_bar= mean density of valid neighbours andx_d= the valid neighbour best aligned with the outward normal(x - c^n)/|x - c^n|;G_neq(x_d) = G(x_d) - f_eq(rho(x_d), u(x_d)).- Valid donor: inside the domain, base FLUID,
!in_old && !in_new. - Sets:
V(x)= the 8 lattice neighbours that are in the domain, base FLUID and!in_old && !in_new.rho_bar= mean density overV(x). NEQ donor = the member ofV(x)with the largestc·namong those withc·n > 0(n= outward normal atc^n); none → NEQ part 0 (counted aseq_only). V(x)empty → no defined density: the cell is refilled withf_eq(RHO, u_w(x))so all 9 slots stay defined, theno_donorcounter is incremented, and the host treatsno_donor > 0after the run as a hard failure (simulation unusable). It is not a silent fallback.- Non-emptiness is NOT assumed from the displacement bound. Geometry
assumptions: circle radius
R ≥ R_min(CANDIDATE 4 cells),|Δc|_2 ≤ 0.5. S1 includes a host enumeration over sub-cell centre positions and displacement directions on a fine grid within these bounds that checks every fresh cell has nonemptyV(x); it is evidence for those bounds, not a proof, and runtime keeps the counter. - Fresh cells only write, old-fluid cells only read: no race.
6. Discrete momentum ledger (to review; not a selection)
Notation per step n: F^n = fluid set after M1; links L = (k_f, dir) at
c^n; f_t = G_dir(k_f); f_r = value M2 writes into (k_s, opp).
Fluid momentum before streaming:
P_pre = P(G^{n-1} on F^{n-1}) - sum_cover sum_q c_q G_q + sum_fresh sum_q c_q G_q^refill
During the pull, every population entering a fluid cell comes from a fluid
cell except the BFL-written slots; f_t leaves into solid and is never pulled
by a fluid cell. Collision conserves momentum for SRT/MRT without forcing.
Hence, in exact arithmetic,
P_fluid^n - P_fluid^{n-1} = - sum_L c (f_t + f_r) - I_cover + I_uncover + B^n + S^n
with B^n external-boundary momentum (inlet/outlet/walls) and S^n forcing.
So F_CME + node_cover - node_uncover is, by construction, the body
momentum that balances the fluid ledger of this storage/update order.
Branch details: halfway fallback links (f_r = f_t plus the moving-wall
addend) and q < 1/2 links enter the link accumulators exactly like Bouzidi
links, with c(f_t + f_r). In the q < 1/2 branch G_dir(k_f - c) is an
interpolation input only, not a fluid-momentum sink. Pull-slot completeness
is the section 3 contract. The scope excludes ddf_shifting (rejected), so
the unshifted force form applies. The balance is a fluid-side identity; it
does not close body+fluid globally in a domain with inlet/outlet/forcing
(B^n, S^n), and the solid-slot writes are boundary plumbing, not physical
streaming packets.
The Wen 2014 relative-velocity link sum adds -u_w (f_t - f_r) = u_w dm per
link (dm = f_r - f_t, the BFL mass defect). That term has no counterpart in
the fluid ledger above. Peng et al. (PRE 2016 submitted, §II.C, Eqs. 20–21)
show for a straight wall that the bounce-back error accumulated before a node
switch cancels with the switching momentum. Whether sum u_w dm approximates
I_cover - I_uncover here (implying double counting if both are used) is
NOT demonstrated for this implementation: it needs a bounded experiment
(prescribed slow translation; cumulative sum u_w dm vs cumulative node
impulse, per crossing cycle). Momentum conservation is also distinct from
Galilean invariance, which G4 tests.
External reference note: waLBerla's covered/refill momentum switches
(conserveMomentumWhenMapping, conserveMomentumWhenRestoring) default to
false (Astra), so their existence does not establish which combination its
validation cases use. A bookkeeping identity alone does not select the
physical force either.
Mass ledger (same proposition status). With M^n the active-fluid mass
summed over F^n at the sample point,
M^n - M^{n-1} = sum_L dm - m_cover + m_uncover + B_m^n
(dm = f_r - f_t, m_cover/m_uncover = summed sum_q G of covered and
refilled cells, B_m external-boundary mass flux; collision conserves mass).
Sample point (fixed): post-collision storage after the swap of step n, i.e.
the same level G that M1 reads at step n+1; both ledgers are evaluated
there. Ledger residual = left side minus every listed term. Zero mass flux
does not imply zero momentum exchange: closed walls (bounce-back, free-slip)
still exchange momentum, so "no inlet/outlet, no forcing" does NOT give
B = S = 0. The rounding-level momentum check therefore uses either a
momentum-isolated case (periodic in both directions, no forcing) or counts
the wall impulse explicitly as part of B; the mass check may use a closed
domain. Otherwise B, S are not separately measured, the residual is
reported as their estimate and is not a pass criterion.
Both ledger identities are proposed, unreviewed: they are not called
proven until review and a host replay agree.
Accumulators (separate, per body, per step window; all reported raw):
link_cme, link_wen_correction (= sum u_w dm), node_cover,
node_uncover (momentum), link_dm, mass_cover, mass_uncover (mass),
plus counters of crossings, eq_only and no_donor, so force spikes can be
correlated with crossing events.
OPEN — structural RHS candidates (not selected):
(a) link_cme + node_cover - node_uncover; (b) link_cme + link_wen_correction
(no node impulse). Selection follows the ledger review and the bounded
experiment above.
7. Rejection semantics
- Before any mutation (
ValueError, no device write, host state unchanged): moving body with EsoPull,ddf_shifting, refinement/blocked stepper, D3Q19, Jets or surface actuation on that body,sync_bodies/checkpoint while a moving body exists; swept band touching domain boundaries, other bodies, sensors or force regions;set_bodyoffset outside the declared box, per-step move|c_new - c_old|_2 > 0.5cell (the single bound of 4a), speed above the declared bound. - Host motion state is committed only after the upload and the following synchronization of the step group succeed (section 4); any failure in between makes the simulation unusable and no host/device match is reported.
- The only soft device diagnostic is
eq_only(NEQ part omitted, counted).no_donor > 0is a hard failure: it is checked after the step group and before the step is committed or any results are returned; on failure the simulation is unusable (section 5).
8. Coupling and units (CANDIDATE)
Lattice units, rho0 = 1, per unit span. Step n uses c^n, u^n and yields
F^n. Weak staggered update
v^{n+1} = v^n + (F^n - c v^n - k y^n)/m, y^{n+1} = y^n + v^{n+1}
(Newmark is an alternative; OPEN). Mass, natural frequency, damping and U_r
follow the chosen benchmark's own definitions. Leontini, Thompson & Hourigan,
JFS 22:857–864 (2006), DOI 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2006.04.003, as read by
Grok from the full text: Re = 200, m* = m/m_f = 10 (m_f displaced fluid
mass), zeta = c/c_crit = 0.01, U* = U/(f_N D) with f_N the natural
frequency in fluid assuming an inviscid added-mass term; the paper also
reports frequencies normalised by the in-vacuo value. Our runner derives k
from that in-fluid f_N (added-mass coefficient as stated in the paper) and
never from the vacuum formula; c_crit convention and the original
comparison data are still OPEN. Stability/convergence is gated by fluid
time/space refinement of the coupled run, not assumed from the mass ratio;
structural sub-stepping does not substitute for fluid-coupling time
refinement.
9. Gates (map; tolerances OPEN, declared before runs)
G0 zero-motion regression, split: G0a populations of the existing stationary
and spin-only path bitwise unchanged vs main; G0b moving path at rest (with
and without spin) reproduces the stationary link set and populations; force
estimator outputs are compared separately from populations, since the moving
path adds estimator terms · G1 raw force sign (Cd > 0) ·
G2/G3 prescribed translation incl. ledger accumulators · G4 matched
relative-flow (moving body in quiescent fluid vs fixed body in uniform
stream), optional boost, co-moving sanity · G5 Dütsch et al. 1998 Re 100,
KC 5 in-line (needs 2-component offset) · G6 Leontini free transverse VIV
(m* = 10, ζ = 0.01, Re = 200, definitions pending) · G7 time-level contract
frozen before the oscillator.
Candidate pre-run engineering tolerances (Astra; for discussion, not literature limits or measured outcomes; norms, averaging window, convergence protocol and physical reference uncertainty must be fixed before adoption, and none may be weakened after seeing runs): normalised momentum-ledger residual FP32 ≤ 5e-6 (FP64 oracle ≤ 2e-13); 10-cycle relative mass drift ≤ 1e-4; prescribed-motion grid study D = 40/80/160 with change in the force-response amplitude (observed quantity and norm to be named before adoption) ≤ 2 % and phase ≤ 2°; enlarged domain amplitude change ≤ 1 %; matched-frame force RMS ≤ 2 % and improving with refinement; VIV refinement amplitude ≤ 2 %, frequency ≤ 1 %, five consecutive cycle amplitudes within 1 %.
Conditions stated before any moving kernel (S2/S3), not only at the oscillator stage: (i) fluid refinement protocol for the prescribed-motion gates — diffusive scaling (dx halved, dt quartered, physical Re, KC and amplitude fixed), the observed quantities and norms named in advance; (ii) Galilean constant-boost G4-boost requires boundaries compatible with a uniform boost (periodic in the boost direction or boundaries that move with it); if the current dense configuration cannot represent that, G4-boost is recorded as not runnable rather than replaced by another test.
10. Proposed minimal S1 scope (host only; held until cross-review)
add_bodymoving-circle declaration: base centre, declared offset box (x/y), speed bound; swept-band computation and band-placement validation.set_body(offset=..., velocity=..., omega=...)validation before mutation (section 7), applied/pending state and the run-transition table of 4a, and the fail-closed commit of section 4.- Host enumeration check of refill-donor non-emptiness (section 5) within
the declared
R_minand displacement bound. - Motion-record host layout and upload path; exclusion of moving bodies from
the packed
CurvedBoundaryKernellinks (stationary packing unchanged). - Explicit rejections for unsupported modes.
- S1 execution guard: until the S2 moving kernels exist, any
run(n)withn > 0(andstep(n)) while a moving body is declared raises before any device mutation (no action/motion upload, no launch), including the nominal at-rest case, because the moving body is excluded from the static packed links and nothing else would apply its boundary.run(0)keeps its existing behaviour. Simulations without moving bodies are unaffected. Preparation/commit helpers are exercised by host tests with mocks; no operational unsupported stepping path is exposed. - Host tests (Astra runs them): rejection-before-mutation, band geometry, derived centres, fail-closed behaviour under an injected upload/sync failure, stationary packing byte-identical, execution guard (positive-step run with a moving body raises before upload/launch; stationary unaffected). No kernels, no GPU runs, no y-only VIV oscillator (S4), no force RHS.
11. Remaining decisions
Structural RHS (section 6); motion-record layout; refill details; coupling scheme; benchmark definitions and digitized reference data; tolerances; execution/resource feasibility (Astra, pending); whether a quiescent domain (zero inlet velocity) runs cleanly in the current config.